Ad is loading...
NMCAX vs RPMGX
NMCAX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts NMCAX vs RPMGX
Voya MidCap Opportunities A
Price$18.93
Change+$0.18 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets737.95M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$102.33
Change+$0.38 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets30.69B
NMCAX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMCAX vs. RPMGX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMCAX is a Hold and RPMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 30.7B vs. NMCAX (738M). RPMGX pays higher dividends than NMCAX: RPMGX (0.05) vs NMCAX (0.00). NMCAX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: NMCAX (26 years) vs RPMGX (33 years). NMCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. RPMGX (21.70). NMCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: NMCAX (1000) vs RPMGX (2500). NMCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.29 vs. RPMGX (3.12). RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : 4.05 vs. NMCAX (-9.86).
| NMCAX | RPMGX | NMCAX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.954 | 2.607 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 738M | 30.7B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.05 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.29 | 3.12 | 201% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.19 | -3.66 | -278% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.86 | 4.05 | -244% |
| Returns for 10 years | -15.60 | 38.31 | -41% |