Ad is loading...
NMCAX vs RPMGX
NMCAX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts NMCAX vs RPMGX
Voya MidCap Opportunities A
Price$18.36
Change-$0.68 (-3.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets708M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$99.28
Change-$2.09 (-2.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.49B
NMCAX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMCAX vs. RPMGX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMCAX is a Hold and RPMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 29.5B vs. NMCAX (708M). RPMGX pays higher dividends than NMCAX: RPMGX (0.05) vs NMCAX (0.00). NMCAX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: NMCAX (27 years) vs RPMGX (33 years). NMCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. RPMGX (21.70). NMCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: NMCAX (1000) vs RPMGX (2500). NMCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.62 vs. RPMGX (-5.34). RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : 1.27 vs. NMCAX (-14.76).
| NMCAX | RPMGX | NMCAX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.824 | -0.451 | -183% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 708M | 29.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.05 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.62 | -5.34 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.88 | -1.07 | -1,115% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.76 | 1.27 | -1,158% |
| Returns for 10 years | -22.89 | 25.08 | -91% |