Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMCAX vs RPMGX
NMCAX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts NMCAX vs RPMGX
Voya MidCap Opportunities A
Price$19.64
Change+$0.06 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets725.86M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$101.34
Change-$0.12 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.41B
NMCAX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMCAX vs. RPMGX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMCAX is a Hold and RPMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 27.4B vs. NMCAX (726M). NMCAX (0.00) and RPMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . NMCAX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: NMCAX (27 years) vs RPMGX (33 years). NMCAX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.75). NMCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RPMGX (22.60). NMCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: NMCAX (1000) vs RPMGX (2500). NMCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.53 vs. RPMGX (-0.10). RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : 1.47 vs. NMCAX (-13.59).
| NMCAX | RPMGX | NMCAX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.75 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.75 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.523 | 1.735 | 434% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 726M | 27.4B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.53 | -0.10 | -12,724% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.61 | 5.40 | 437% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.59 | 1.47 | -924% |
| Returns for 10 years | -17.42 | 24.39 | -71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers