Ad is loading...
NMCAX vs RPMGX
NMCAX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts NMCAX vs RPMGX
Voya MidCap Opportunities A
Price$15.81
Change+$0.20 (+1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets599.34M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$87.51
Change+$1.50 (+1.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.97B
NMCAX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMCAX vs. RPMGX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMCAX is a Buy and RPMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 25B vs. NMCAX (599M). NMCAX (0.00) and RPMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . NMCAX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: NMCAX (27 years) vs RPMGX (33 years). NMCAX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.76). NMCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RPMGX (22.60). NMCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: NMCAX (1000) vs RPMGX (2500). NMCAX (-18.70) and RPMGX (-19.07) have marching annual gain over last year. RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : 7.94 vs. NMCAX (-11.41).
| NMCAX | RPMGX | NMCAX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.76 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.76 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.278 | -13.757 | 104% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 599M | 25B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.70 | -19.07 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.86 | -14.02 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.41 | 7.94 | -144% |
| Returns for 10 years | -35.52 | 6.36 | -559% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers