Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMCAX vs RPMGX
NMCAX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts NMCAX vs RPMGX
NMCAX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMCAX vs. RPMGX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMCAX is a Buy and RPMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 22.6B vs. NMCAX (760M). NMCAX (0.00) and RPMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . NMCAX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: NMCAX (28 years) vs RPMGX (34 years). NMCAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.77). NMCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. RPMGX (31.50). NMCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: NMCAX (1000) vs RPMGX (2500). RPMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.63 vs. NMCAX (-11.91). RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : -18.31 vs. NMCAX (-33.72).
| NMCAX | RPMGX | NMCAX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.77 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.77 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.243 | 6.057 | 136% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 760M | 22.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.91 | 1.63 | -732% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.92 | 5.17 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.72 | -18.31 | 184% |
| Returns for 10 years | -24.58 | 31.98 | -77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers