Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMCAX vs RPMGX
NMCAX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts NMCAX vs RPMGX
NMCAX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMCAX vs. RPMGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMCAX is a Hold and RPMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 21.1B vs. NMCAX (716M). NMCAX (0.00) and RPMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . NMCAX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: NMCAX (28 years) vs RPMGX (34 years). NMCAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.77). NMCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. RPMGX (31.50). NMCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: NMCAX (1000) vs RPMGX (2500). RPMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.56 vs. NMCAX (-19.42). RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : -24.68 vs. NMCAX (-38.90).
| NMCAX | RPMGX | NMCAX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.77 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.77 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.387 | -0.051 | -6,587% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 716M | 21.1B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.42 | -6.56 | 296% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.09 | -1.58 | 259% |
| Returns for 5 years | -38.90 | -24.68 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | -25.40 | 28.29 | -90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement