Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMCAX vs RRMGX
NMCAX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts NMCAX vs RRMGX
Voya MidCap Opportunities A
Price$18.56
Change+$0.06 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets664.57M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$87.68
Change+$0.02 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.05B
NMCAX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMCAX vs. RRMGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMCAX is a Hold and RRMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 25B vs. NMCAX (665M). NMCAX (0.00) and RRMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . NMCAX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: NMCAX (27 years) vs RRMGX (23 years). RRMGX (1.29) is less costly to investors than NMCAX (1.19). NMCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. RRMGX (22.60). NMCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRMGX: NMCAX (1000) vs RRMGX (2500). RRMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.63 vs. NMCAX (-11.74). RRMGX return over 5 years is better than : -14.91 vs. NMCAX (-28.07).
| NMCAX | RRMGX | NMCAX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.29 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.29 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.593 | -0.296 | -539% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 665M | 25B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.74 | -10.63 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.15 | 4.72 | 448% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.07 | -14.91 | 188% |
| Returns for 10 years | -20.26 | 12.67 | -160% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers