Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMCAX vs RRMGX
NMCAX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts NMCAX vs RRMGX
Voya MidCap Opportunities A
Price$18.89
Change+$0.18 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets708.28M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$87.21
Change+$0.59 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.52B
NMCAX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMCAX vs. RRMGX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMCAX is a Buy and RRMGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 27.5B vs. NMCAX (708M). NMCAX (0.00) and RRMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . NMCAX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: NMCAX (27 years) vs RRMGX (23 years). RRMGX (1.29) and NMCAX (1.25) have similar cost to investors . NMCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RRMGX (22.60). NMCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRMGX: NMCAX (1000) vs RRMGX (2500). NMCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.27 vs. RRMGX (-6.35). RRMGX return over 5 years is better than : -3.11 vs. NMCAX (-10.95).
| NMCAX | RRMGX | NMCAX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.29 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.29 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.746 | -1.479 | -186% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 708M | 27.5B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.27 | -6.35 | -4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.50 | -0.78 | -3,017% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.95 | -3.11 | 352% |
| Returns for 10 years | -21.45 | 11.59 | -185% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers