Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMCAX vs RRMGX
NMCAX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts NMCAX vs RRMGX
Voya MidCap Opportunities A
Price$19.13
Change+$0.19 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets711.82M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$88.10
Change+$0.43 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.58B
NMCAX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMCAX vs. RRMGX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMCAX is a Hold and RRMGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 27.6B vs. NMCAX (712M). NMCAX (0.00) and RRMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . NMCAX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: NMCAX (27 years) vs RRMGX (23 years). RRMGX (1.29) and NMCAX (1.25) have similar cost to investors . NMCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RRMGX (22.60). NMCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRMGX: NMCAX (1000) vs RRMGX (2500). NMCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.69 vs. RRMGX (-4.94). RRMGX return over 5 years is better than : 3.47 vs. NMCAX (-7.11).
| NMCAX | RRMGX | NMCAX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.29 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.29 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.009 | -0.284 | -1,410% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 712M | 27.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.69 | -4.94 | -14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.73 | 6.36 | 515% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.11 | 3.47 | -205% |
| Returns for 10 years | -19.40 | 13.42 | -145% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers