Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMCAX vs RRMGX
NMCAX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts NMCAX vs RRMGX
Voya MidCap Opportunities A
Price$19.90
Change+$0.21 (+1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets713.49M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$90.87
Change+$1.10 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.68B
NMCAX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMCAX vs. RRMGX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMCAX is a Buy and RRMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 26.7B vs. NMCAX (713M). NMCAX (0.00) and RRMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . NMCAX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: NMCAX (27 years) vs RRMGX (23 years). RRMGX (1.29) and NMCAX (1.25) have similar cost to investors . NMCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. RRMGX (22.60). NMCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRMGX: NMCAX (1000) vs RRMGX (2500). NMCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.39 vs. RRMGX (-7.16). RRMGX return over 5 years is better than : -9.45 vs. NMCAX (-20.35).
| NMCAX | RRMGX | NMCAX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.29 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.29 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.127 | 2.104 | 386% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 713M | 26.7B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.39 | -7.16 | -33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.45 | 15.21 | 240% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.35 | -9.45 | 215% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.15 | 18.31 | -72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement