Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMCAX vs RRMGX
NMCAX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts NMCAX vs RRMGX
NMCAX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMCAX vs. RRMGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMCAX is a Hold and RRMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 21.1B vs. NMCAX (716M). NMCAX (0.00) and RRMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . NMCAX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: NMCAX (28 years) vs RRMGX (24 years). RRMGX (1.31) is less costly to investors than NMCAX (1.19). NMCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. RRMGX (31.50). NMCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRMGX: NMCAX (1000) vs RRMGX (2500). RRMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.87 vs. NMCAX (-19.42). RRMGX return over 5 years is better than : -29.10 vs. NMCAX (-38.90).
| NMCAX | RRMGX | NMCAX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.31 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.31 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.387 | -0.426 | -795% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 716M | 21.1B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.42 | -7.87 | 247% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.09 | -5.46 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | -38.90 | -29.10 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | -25.40 | 16.81 | -151% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement