Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMCAX vs TRQZX
NMCAX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts NMCAX vs TRQZX
Voya MidCap Opportunities A
Price$19.90
Change+$0.21 (+1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets713.49M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$105.16
Change+$1.27 (+1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.68B
NMCAX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 26.7B vs. NMCAX (713M). TRQZX pays higher dividends than NMCAX: TRQZX (0.60) vs NMCAX (0.00). NMCAX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: NMCAX (27 years) vs TRQZX (6 years). NMCAX (1.25) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). NMCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. TRQZX (22.60). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMCAX: TRQZX (0) vs NMCAX (1000). NMCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.39 vs. TRQZX (-4.74). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : -1.60 vs. NMCAX (-20.35).
| NMCAX | TRQZX | NMCAX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.61 | 205% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.127 | 3.147 | 258% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 713M | 26.7B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.60 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.39 | -4.74 | -51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.45 | 22.17 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.35 | -1.60 | 1,270% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.15 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement