Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMCAX vs TRQZX
NMCAX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts NMCAX vs TRQZX
NMCAX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMCAX vs. TRQZX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMCAX is a Buy and TRQZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 23.2B vs. NMCAX (590M). TRQZX pays higher dividends than NMCAX: TRQZX (0.72) vs NMCAX (0.00). NMCAX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: NMCAX (28 years) vs TRQZX (6 years). NMCAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). NMCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. TRQZX (31.50). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMCAX: TRQZX (0) vs NMCAX (1000). TRQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.47 vs. NMCAX (-9.71). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : -13.33 vs. NMCAX (-27.68).
| NMCAX | TRQZX | NMCAX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.61 | 195% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.540 | 2.726 | 277% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 590M | 23.2B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.72 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.71 | 3.47 | -280% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.95 | 6.62 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | -27.68 | -13.33 | 208% |
| Returns for 10 years | -22.30 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement