Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMCCX vs RRMGX
NMCCX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts NMCCX vs RRMGX
NMCCX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMCCX vs. RRMGX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMCCX is a Buy and RRMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 23.2B vs. NMCCX (590M). NMCCX (0.00) and RRMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . NMCCX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: NMCCX (28 years) vs RRMGX (24 years). NMCCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than RRMGX (1.31). NMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. RRMGX (31.50). NMCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRMGX: NMCCX (1000) vs RRMGX (2500). RRMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.17 vs. NMCCX (-44.05). RRMGX return over 5 years is better than : -21.07 vs. NMCCX (-72.53).
| NMCCX | RRMGX | NMCCX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.31 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.31 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.310 | 2.177 | 336% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 590M | 23.2B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -44.05 | 1.17 | -3,761% |
| Returns for 3 years | -48.38 | -0.10 | 46,476% |
| Returns for 5 years | -72.53 | -21.07 | 344% |
| Returns for 10 years | -79.03 | 20.65 | -383% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement