Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMCCX vs RRMGX
NMCCX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts NMCCX vs RRMGX
NMCCX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMCCX vs. RRMGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMCCX is a Hold and RRMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 22.5B vs. NMCCX (594M). NMCCX (0.00) and RRMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . NMCCX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: NMCCX (28 years) vs RRMGX (24 years). NMCCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than RRMGX (1.31). NMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. RRMGX (31.50). NMCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRMGX: NMCCX (1000) vs RRMGX (2500). RRMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.98 vs. NMCCX (-43.36). RRMGX return over 5 years is better than : -24.15 vs. NMCCX (-74.04).
| NMCCX | RRMGX | NMCCX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.31 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.31 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.480 | 1.491 | 569% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 594M | 22.5B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -43.36 | -0.98 | 4,419% |
| Returns for 3 years | -48.33 | -2.00 | 2,417% |
| Returns for 5 years | -74.04 | -24.15 | 307% |
| Returns for 10 years | -78.03 | 24.57 | -318% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement