Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMCCX vs TRQZX
NMCCX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts NMCCX vs TRQZX
NMCCX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMCCX vs. TRQZX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMCCX is a Buy and TRQZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 23.2B vs. NMCCX (590M). TRQZX pays higher dividends than NMCCX: TRQZX (0.72) vs NMCCX (0.00). NMCCX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: NMCCX (28 years) vs TRQZX (6 years). NMCCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). NMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. TRQZX (31.50). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMCCX: TRQZX (0) vs NMCCX (1000). TRQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.47 vs. NMCCX (-44.05). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : -13.33 vs. NMCCX (-72.53).
| NMCCX | TRQZX | NMCCX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.61 | 318% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.310 | 2.726 | 268% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 590M | 23.2B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.72 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -44.05 | 3.47 | -1,269% |
| Returns for 3 years | -48.38 | 6.62 | -730% |
| Returns for 5 years | -72.53 | -13.33 | 544% |
| Returns for 10 years | -79.03 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers