Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMCIX vs TRQZX
NMCIX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts NMCIX vs TRQZX
NMCIX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMCIX vs. TRQZX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMCIX is a Buy and TRQZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 22.6B vs. NMCIX (578M). TRQZX pays higher dividends than NMCIX: TRQZX (0.71) vs NMCIX (0.00). NMCIX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: NMCIX (28 years) vs TRQZX (6 years). NMCIX (0.96) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). NMCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. TRQZX (31.50). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMCIX: TRQZX (0) vs NMCIX (250000). TRQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.41 vs. NMCIX (-4.99). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : -15.50 vs. NMCIX (-18.88).
| NMCIX | TRQZX | NMCIX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.61 | 157% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.615 | 4.201 | 229% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 578M | 22.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.71 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.99 | 0.41 | -1,208% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.28 | 1.72 | 598% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.88 | -15.50 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.43 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement