Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMCIX vs TRQZX
NMCIX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts NMCIX vs TRQZX
NMCIX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMCIX vs. TRQZX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMCIX is a Hold and TRQZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 21.1B vs. NMCIX (716M). TRQZX pays higher dividends than NMCIX: TRQZX (0.71) vs NMCIX (0.00). NMCIX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: NMCIX (28 years) vs TRQZX (6 years). NMCIX (0.96) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). NMCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. TRQZX (31.50). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMCIX: TRQZX (0) vs NMCIX (250000). TRQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.76 vs. NMCIX (-14.51). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : -22.12 vs. NMCIX (-27.91).
| NMCIX | TRQZX | NMCIX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.61 | 157% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.595 | 0.488 | 736% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 716M | 21.1B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.71 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.51 | -5.76 | 252% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.98 | 0.92 | 649% |
| Returns for 5 years | -27.91 | -22.12 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.99 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers