Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMFIX vs RGSVX
NMFIX vs RGSVX Comparison
Open Charts NMFIX vs RGSVX
NMFIX vs RGSVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMFIX vs. RGSVX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMFIX is a Buy and RGSVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMFIX has more cash in the bank: 995M vs. RGSVX (171M). RGSVX pays higher dividends than NMFIX: RGSVX (3.22) vs NMFIX (2.35). NMFIX was incepted earlier than RGSVX: NMFIX (14 years) vs RGSVX (10 years). RGSVX (1.06) and NMFIX (1.03) have similar cost to investors . RGSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. NMFIX (56.86). NMFIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSVX: NMFIX (2500) vs RGSVX (1000000). RGSVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.20 vs. NMFIX (12.91). RGSVX return over 5 years is better than : 47.67 vs. NMFIX (24.41).
| NMFIX | RGSVX | NMFIX / RGSVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.86 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.06 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.074 | 12.575 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 995M | 171M | 582% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.35 | 3.22 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.91 | 20.20 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.11 | 45.78 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.41 | 47.67 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.37 | 118.52 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers