Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMFIX vs RGSVX
NMFIX vs RGSVX Comparison
Open Charts NMFIX vs RGSVX
NMFIX vs RGSVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMFIX vs. RGSVX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMFIX is a Hold and RGSVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMFIX has more cash in the bank: 984M vs. RGSVX (172M). RGSVX pays higher dividends than NMFIX: RGSVX (3.23) vs NMFIX (2.34). NMFIX was incepted earlier than RGSVX: NMFIX (14 years) vs RGSVX (10 years). RGSVX (1.06) and NMFIX (1.03) have similar cost to investors . RGSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. NMFIX (56.86). NMFIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSVX: NMFIX (2500) vs RGSVX (1000000). RGSVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.50 vs. NMFIX (8.74). RGSVX return over 5 years is better than : 43.81 vs. NMFIX (21.08).
| NMFIX | RGSVX | NMFIX / RGSVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.86 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.06 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.329 | 11.163 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 984M | 172M | 572% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.34 | 3.23 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.74 | 16.50 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.34 | 54.98 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.08 | 43.81 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.79 | 114.55 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers