Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMIAX vs RWMFX
NMIAX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NMIAX vs RWMFX
NMIAX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMIAX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMIAX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. NMIAX (485M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NMIAX: RWMFX (1.40) vs NMIAX (0.63). NMIAX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NMIAX (30 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). NMIAX (1.21) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). NMIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMIAX: RWMFX (250) vs NMIAX (2000). NMIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.00 vs. RWMFX (8.10). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.71 vs. NMIAX (5.28).
| NMIAX | RWMFX | NMIAX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.31 | 268% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.31 | 390% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.836 | 5.575 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 485M | 214B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 1.40 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.00 | 8.10 | 173% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.65 | 33.11 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.28 | 26.71 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.00 | 85.42 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement