Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMIAX vs RWMFX
NMIAX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NMIAX vs RWMFX
NMIAX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMIAX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMIAX is a StrongBuy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NMIAX (489M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NMIAX: RWMFX (1.41) vs NMIAX (0.58). NMIAX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NMIAX (30 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). NMIAX (1.22) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). NMIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. RWMFX (32.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMIAX: RWMFX (250) vs NMIAX (2000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. NMIAX (0.55). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.39 vs. NMIAX (-0.38).
| NMIAX | RWMFX | NMIAX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.31 | 268% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.31 | 394% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.545 | 4.508 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 489M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 1.41 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.55 | 2.09 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.69 | 30.24 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.38 | 27.39 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.01 | 82.36 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers