Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMIAX vs RWMFX
NMIAX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NMIAX vs RWMFX
NMIAX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMIAX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jul 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMIAX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. NMIAX (512M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NMIAX: RWMFX (1.44) vs NMIAX (0.60). NMIAX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NMIAX (30 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). NMIAX (1.22) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). NMIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMIAX: RWMFX (250) vs NMIAX (2000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.76 vs. NMIAX (5.19). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.02 vs. NMIAX (0.92).
| NMIAX | RWMFX | NMIAX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.31 | 268% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.31 | 394% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.212 | 3.858 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 512M | 219B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.44 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.19 | 5.76 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.63 | 29.17 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.92 | 28.02 | 3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.74 | 77.65 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement