Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMIMX vs RWMFX
NMIMX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NMIMX vs RWMFX
NMIMX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMIMX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMIMX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NMIMX (462M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NMIMX: RWMFX (1.40) vs NMIMX (0.83). NMIMX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NMIMX (30 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). NMIMX (0.96) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). NMIMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMIMX: RWMFX (250) vs NMIMX (2000). NMIMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.36 vs. RWMFX (8.15). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.55 vs. NMIMX (9.83).
| NMIMX | RWMFX | NMIMX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.31 | 187% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.31 | 310% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.451 | 1.616 | 461% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 462M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 1.40 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.36 | 8.15 | 188% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.17 | 30.58 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.83 | 27.55 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.00 | 82.86 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement