NMM
Price
$43.68
Change
-$1.35 (-3.00%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.3B
81 days until earnings call
SFL
Price
$9.32
Change
-$0.07 (-0.75%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.25B
75 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

NMM vs SFL

Header iconNMM vs SFL Comparison
Open Charts NMM vs SFLBanner chart's image
Navios Maritime Partners
Price$43.68
Change-$1.35 (-3.00%)
Volume$85.97K
Capitalization1.3B
SFL
Price$9.32
Change-$0.07 (-0.75%)
Volume$1.3M
Capitalization1.25B
NMM vs SFL Comparison Chart
Loading...
NMM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NMM vs. SFL commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMM is a Hold and SFL is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (NMM: $43.68 vs. SFL: $9.32)
Brand notoriety: NMM and SFL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NMM: 69% vs. SFL: 130%
Market capitalization -- NMM: $1.3B vs. SFL: $1.25B
NMM [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $1.3B. SFL’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $1.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $29.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NMM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSFL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NMM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SFL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NMM is a better buy in the long-term than SFL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NMM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NMM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SFL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NMM is a better buy in the short-term than SFL.

Price Growth

NMM (@Marine Shipping) experienced а -0.73% price change this week, while SFL (@Marine Shipping) price change was -1.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

NMM is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.

SFL is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (-1.17% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMM($1.3B) and SFL($1.25B) have the same market capitalization . SFL has higher P/E ratio than NMM: SFL (9.23) vs NMM (3.32). NMM YTD gains are higher at: 4.141 vs. SFL (-8.121). NMM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 753M vs. SFL (529M). SFL has more cash in the bank: 206M vs. NMM (24M). NMM has less debt than SFL: NMM (1.36B) vs SFL (2.82B). NMM has higher revenues than SFL: NMM (1.33B) vs SFL (822M).
NMMSFLNMM / SFL
Capitalization1.3B1.25B104%
EBITDA753M529M142%
Gain YTD4.141-8.121-51%
P/E Ratio3.329.2336%
Revenue1.33B822M162%
Total Cash24M206M12%
Total Debt1.36B2.82B48%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NMM vs SFL: Fundamental Ratings
NMM
SFL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1559
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2379
SMR RATING
1..100
5861
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5380
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1995
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SFL's Valuation (8) in the Marine Shipping industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NMM (46). This means that SFL’s stock grew somewhat faster than NMM’s over the last 12 months.

NMM's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Marine Shipping industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFL (79). This means that NMM’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFL’s over the last 12 months.

NMM's SMR Rating (58) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as SFL (61). This means that NMM’s stock grew similarly to SFL’s over the last 12 months.

NMM's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as SFL (80). This means that NMM’s stock grew similarly to SFL’s over the last 12 months.

NMM's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Marine Shipping industry is significantly better than the same rating for SFL (95). This means that NMM’s stock grew significantly faster than SFL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NMMSFL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NMM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NOSGX13.19N/A
N/A
Northern Small Cap Value
MMUBX22.77N/A
N/A
MFS Utilities B
CIUEX11.64N/A
N/A
Six Circles International Uncon Eq
MGQIX17.53N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Global Stars I
FSBKX20.73-0.02
-0.10%
Federated Hermes Global Allocation R

NMM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMM has been loosely correlated with GSL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NMM jumps, then GSL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMM
1D Price
Change %
NMM100%
+0.49%
GSL - NMM
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
GOGL - NMM
45%
Loosely correlated
+3.08%
SBLK - NMM
44%
Loosely correlated
+6.95%
GNK - NMM
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
DAC - NMM
41%
Loosely correlated
+2.34%
More

SFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFL has been loosely correlated with ASC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SFL jumps, then ASC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFL
1D Price
Change %
SFL100%
-1.57%
ASC - SFL
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.55%
ECO - SFL
51%
Loosely correlated
-6.77%
SB - SFL
50%
Loosely correlated
+3.25%
NMM - SFL
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
HAFN - SFL
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.17%
More