Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMSAX vs VSCIX
NMSAX vs VSCIX Comparison
Open Charts NMSAX vs VSCIX
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$22.39
Change-$0.09 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.67B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$121.03
Change-$0.45 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.18B
NMSAX vs VSCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMSAX vs. VSCIX commentary
Sep 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMSAX is a Buy and VSCIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSCIX has more cash in the bank: 154B vs. NMSAX (2.67B). VSCIX pays higher dividends than NMSAX: VSCIX (1.32) vs NMSAX (1.20). NMSAX was incepted earlier than VSCIX: NMSAX (29 years) vs VSCIX (28 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than VSCIX (0.04). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. VSCIX (13.00). NMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VSCIX: NMSAX (2000) vs VSCIX (5000000). VSCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.29 vs. NMSAX (-9.33). VSCIX return over 5 years is better than : 60.61 vs. NMSAX (12.60).
| NMSAX | VSCIX | NMSAX / VSCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.04 | 1,125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.04 | 1,125% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.235 | 5.285 | -23% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.67B | 154B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 1.32 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.33 | 9.29 | -100% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.66 | 33.91 | -14% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.60 | 60.61 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.69 | 137.15 | 10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement