Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMSAX vs VSCIX
NMSAX vs VSCIX Comparison
Open Charts NMSAX vs VSCIX
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$20.72
Change+$0.32 (+1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.52B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$113.58
Change+$1.56 (+1.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
NMSAX vs VSCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMSAX vs. VSCIX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMSAX is a Buy and VSCIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSCIX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. NMSAX (2.52B). VSCIX pays higher dividends than NMSAX: VSCIX (1.49) vs NMSAX (1.29). NMSAX was incepted earlier than VSCIX: NMSAX (29 years) vs VSCIX (28 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than VSCIX (0.04). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. VSCIX (13.00). NMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VSCIX: NMSAX (2000) vs VSCIX (5000000). VSCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.98 vs. NMSAX (-9.09). VSCIX return over 5 years is better than : 68.74 vs. NMSAX (18.81).
| NMSAX | VSCIX | NMSAX / VSCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.04 | 1,125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.04 | 1,125% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.013 | -2.626 | 381% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.52B | 148B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 1.49 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.09 | 7.98 | -114% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.37 | 29.41 | -35% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.81 | 68.74 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.13 | 101.13 | -5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement