Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMSAX vs VSCIX
NMSAX vs VSCIX Comparison
Open Charts NMSAX vs VSCIX
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$21.40
Change+$0.24 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.59B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$116.54
Change-$0.16 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.28B
NMSAX vs VSCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMSAX vs. VSCIX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMSAX is a Buy and VSCIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSCIX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. NMSAX (2.59B). VSCIX pays higher dividends than NMSAX: VSCIX (1.41) vs NMSAX (1.28). NMSAX was incepted earlier than VSCIX: NMSAX (29 years) vs VSCIX (28 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than VSCIX (0.04). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. VSCIX (13.00). NMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VSCIX: NMSAX (2000) vs VSCIX (5000000). VSCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.63 vs. NMSAX (-14.55). VSCIX return over 5 years is better than : 65.17 vs. NMSAX (14.69).
| NMSAX | VSCIX | NMSAX / VSCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.04 | 1,125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.04 | 1,125% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.661 | 1.518 | -439% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.59B | 153B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 1.41 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.55 | 5.63 | -259% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.06 | 37.65 | -13% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.69 | 65.17 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.03 | 107.94 | -2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement