Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMSAX vs VSCIX
NMSAX vs VSCIX Comparison
Open Charts NMSAX vs VSCIX
NMSAX vs VSCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMSAX vs. VSCIX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMSAX is a Hold and VSCIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSCIX has more cash in the bank: 183B vs. NMSAX (2.67B). VSCIX pays higher dividends than NMSAX: VSCIX (1.23) vs NMSAX (0.90). NMSAX was incepted earlier than VSCIX: NMSAX (30 years) vs VSCIX (29 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than VSCIX (0.03). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. VSCIX (17.00). NMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VSCIX: NMSAX (2000) vs VSCIX (5000000). VSCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.80 vs. NMSAX (14.24). VSCIX return over 5 years is better than : 42.26 vs. NMSAX (-11.34).
| NMSAX | VSCIX | NMSAX / VSCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.03 | 1,500% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.03 | 1,500% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.836 | 18.384 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.67B | 183B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 1.23 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.24 | 24.80 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.37 | 58.33 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.34 | 42.26 | -27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.89 | 157.20 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers