Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMSAX vs VSCIX
NMSAX vs VSCIX Comparison
Open Charts NMSAX vs VSCIX
NMSAX vs VSCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMSAX vs. VSCIX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMSAX is a Hold and VSCIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSCIX has more cash in the bank: 185B vs. NMSAX (2.53B). VSCIX pays higher dividends than NMSAX: VSCIX (1.21) vs NMSAX (0.90). NMSAX was incepted earlier than VSCIX: NMSAX (30 years) vs VSCIX (29 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than VSCIX (0.03). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. VSCIX (17.00). NMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VSCIX: NMSAX (2000) vs VSCIX (5000000). VSCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.13 vs. NMSAX (4.22). VSCIX return over 5 years is better than : 32.95 vs. NMSAX (-15.32).
| NMSAX | VSCIX | NMSAX / VSCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.03 | 1,500% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.03 | 1,500% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.235 | 13.035 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.53B | 185B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 1.21 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.22 | 13.13 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.54 | 49.71 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.32 | 32.95 | -46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.39 | 153.39 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement