Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMSAX vs VSCPX
NMSAX vs VSCPX Comparison
Open Charts NMSAX vs VSCPX
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$21.46
Change+$0.13 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.62B
Vanguard Small Cap Index InstlPlus
Price$336.62
Change+$2.39 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
NMSAX vs VSCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMSAX vs. VSCPX commentary
Jul 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMSAX is a Buy and VSCPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSCPX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. NMSAX (2.62B). VSCPX pays higher dividends than NMSAX: VSCPX (1.42) vs NMSAX (1.28). NMSAX was incepted earlier than VSCPX: NMSAX (29 years) vs VSCPX (15 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than VSCPX (0.03). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. VSCPX (13.00). NMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VSCPX: NMSAX (2000) vs VSCPX (100000000). VSCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. NMSAX (-5.90). VSCPX return over 5 years is better than : 68.36 vs. NMSAX (18.87).
| NMSAX | VSCPX | NMSAX / VSCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.03 | 1,500% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.03 | 1,500% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.911 | 0.732 | -808% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.62B | 148B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 1.42 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.90 | 11.47 | -51% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.47 | 36.98 | -12% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.87 | 68.36 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.68 | 107.91 | -1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement