Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMSAX vs VSCPX
NMSAX vs VSCPX Comparison
Open Charts NMSAX vs VSCPX
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$21.23
Change+$0.26 (+1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.52B
Vanguard Small Cap Index InstlPlus
Price$322.22
Change+$3.63 (+1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
NMSAX vs VSCPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMSAX vs. VSCPX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMSAX is a Buy and VSCPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSCPX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. NMSAX (2.52B). VSCPX pays higher dividends than NMSAX: VSCPX (1.50) vs NMSAX (1.29). NMSAX was incepted earlier than VSCPX: NMSAX (29 years) vs VSCPX (14 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than VSCPX (0.03). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. VSCPX (13.00). NMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VSCPX: NMSAX (2000) vs VSCPX (100000000). VSCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.16 vs. NMSAX (-12.22). VSCPX return over 5 years is better than : 52.42 vs. NMSAX (5.72).
| NMSAX | VSCPX | NMSAX / VSCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.03 | 1,500% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.03 | 1,500% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.499 | -4.054 | 185% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.52B | 148B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 1.50 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.22 | 5.16 | -237% |
| Returns for 3 years | -18.04 | 16.73 | -108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.72 | 52.42 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.69 | 96.69 | -5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement