Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMSAX vs VSCPX
NMSAX vs VSCPX Comparison
Open Charts NMSAX vs VSCPX
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$21.01
Change-$0.03 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.54B
Vanguard Small Cap Index InstlPlus
Price$339.11
Change+$8.03 (+2.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.18B
NMSAX vs VSCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMSAX vs. VSCPX commentary
Aug 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMSAX is a Hold and VSCPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSCPX has more cash in the bank: 154B vs. NMSAX (2.54B). VSCPX pays higher dividends than NMSAX: VSCPX (1.39) vs NMSAX (1.27). NMSAX was incepted earlier than VSCPX: NMSAX (29 years) vs VSCPX (15 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than VSCPX (0.03). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. VSCPX (13.00). NMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VSCPX: NMSAX (2000) vs VSCPX (100000000). VSCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.00 vs. NMSAX (-10.31). VSCPX return over 5 years is better than : 53.30 vs. NMSAX (4.51).
| NMSAX | VSCPX | NMSAX / VSCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.03 | 1,500% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.03 | 1,500% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.190 | -0.218 | 3,302% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.54B | 154B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 1.39 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.31 | 10.00 | -103% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.77 | 17.87 | -94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.51 | 53.30 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.78 | 108.10 | -1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement