Ad is loading...
NMSAX vs VSCPX
NMSAX vs VSCPX Comparison
Open Charts NMSAX vs VSCPX
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$19.49
Change-$1.49 (-7.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.62B
Vanguard Small Cap Index InstlPlus
Price$291.80
Change-$20.91 (-6.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.45B
NMSAX vs VSCPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMSAX vs. VSCPX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMSAX is a Hold and VSCPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSCPX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. NMSAX (2.62B). VSCPX pays higher dividends than NMSAX: VSCPX (1.54) vs NMSAX (1.30). NMSAX was incepted earlier than VSCPX: NMSAX (28 years) vs VSCPX (14 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than VSCPX (0.03). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. VSCPX (12.00). NMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VSCPX: NMSAX (2000) vs VSCPX (100000000). VSCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.20 vs. NMSAX (-12.26). VSCPX return over 5 years is better than : 116.00 vs. NMSAX (53.12).
| NMSAX | VSCPX | NMSAX / VSCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.03 | 1,500% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.03 | 1,500% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.455 | -5.825 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.62B | 153B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 1.54 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.26 | 1.20 | -1,017% |
| Returns for 3 years | -21.69 | 6.53 | -332% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.12 | 116.00 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.37 | 91.20 | -6% |