Ad is loading...
NMSAX vs VSCPX
NMSAX vs VSCPX Comparison
Open Charts NMSAX vs VSCPX
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$20.43
Change+$0.37 (+1.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.44B
Vanguard Small Cap Index InstlPlus
Price$308.99
Change+$4.81 (+1.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.54B
NMSAX vs VSCPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMSAX vs. VSCPX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMSAX is a Buy and VSCPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSCPX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. NMSAX (2.44B). VSCPX pays higher dividends than NMSAX: VSCPX (1.58) vs NMSAX (1.35). NMSAX was incepted earlier than VSCPX: NMSAX (29 years) vs VSCPX (14 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than VSCPX (0.03). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. VSCPX (13.00). NMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VSCPX: NMSAX (2000) vs VSCPX (100000000). VSCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.07 vs. NMSAX (-16.17). VSCPX return over 5 years is better than : 65.30 vs. NMSAX (18.15).
| NMSAX | VSCPX | NMSAX / VSCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.03 | 1,500% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.03 | 1,500% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.513 | -8.394 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.44B | 140B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 1.58 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.17 | -0.07 | 24,150% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.45 | 20.38 | -76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.15 | 65.30 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.01 | 88.40 | -9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers