Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMSAX vs VSCPX
NMSAX vs VSCPX Comparison
Open Charts NMSAX vs VSCPX
NMSAX vs VSCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMSAX vs. VSCPX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMSAX is a Buy and VSCPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSCPX has more cash in the bank: 189B vs. NMSAX (2.65B). VSCPX pays higher dividends than NMSAX: VSCPX (1.20) vs NMSAX (0.88). NMSAX was incepted earlier than VSCPX: NMSAX (30 years) vs VSCPX (16 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than VSCPX (0.02). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. VSCPX (17.00). NMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VSCPX: NMSAX (2000) vs VSCPX (100000000). VSCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.39 vs. NMSAX (14.10). VSCPX return over 5 years is better than : 38.59 vs. NMSAX (-12.48).
| NMSAX | VSCPX | NMSAX / VSCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.02 | 2,250% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.02 | 2,250% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.474 | 15.759 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.65B | 189B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 1.20 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.10 | 23.39 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.28 | 48.26 | 15% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.48 | 38.59 | -32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.04 | 158.18 | 12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers