Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMTRX vs WFCMX
NMTRX vs WFCMX Comparison
Open Charts NMTRX vs WFCMX
NMTRX vs WFCMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMTRX vs. WFCMX commentary
Sep 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMTRX is a Hold and WFCMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMTRX has more cash in the bank: 1.53B vs. WFCMX (795M). NMTRX pays higher dividends than WFCMX: NMTRX (4.76) vs WFCMX (4.13). NMTRX was incepted earlier than WFCMX: NMTRX (19 years) vs WFCMX (18 years). NMTRX (0.05) is less costly to investors than WFCMX (0.03). NMTRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. WFCMX (11.00). NMTRX (0) and WFCMX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NMTRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.55 vs. WFCMX (1.17). WFCMX return over 5 years is better than : 2.91 vs. NMTRX (-0.85).
| NMTRX | WFCMX | NMTRX / WFCMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 0.03 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.713 | -0.808 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.53B | 795M | 192% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.76 | 4.13 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.55 | 1.17 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.72 | 12.17 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.85 | 2.91 | -29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.42 | 18.68 | 115% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement