NN
Price
$12.20
Change
+$0.83 (+7.30%)
Updated
Nov 21, 03:30 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.53B
124 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QTWO
Price
$71.75
Change
+$2.04 (+2.93%)
Updated
Nov 21, 12:57 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.36B
89 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NN vs QTWO

Header iconNN vs QTWO Comparison
Open Charts NN vs QTWOBanner chart's image
NextNav
Price$12.20
Change+$0.83 (+7.30%)
Volume$300
Capitalization1.53B
Q2 Holdings
Price$71.75
Change+$2.04 (+2.93%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization4.36B
NN vs QTWO Comparison Chart in %
NN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QTWO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NN vs. QTWO commentary
Nov 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NN is a Hold and QTWO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 21, 2025
Stock price -- (NN: $11.37 vs. QTWO: $69.71)
Brand notoriety: NN and QTWO are both not notable
NN represents the Computer Communications, while QTWO is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NN: 105% vs. QTWO: 72%
Market capitalization -- NN: $1.53B vs. QTWO: $4.36B
NN [@Computer Communications] is valued at $1.53B. QTWO’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $4.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.56T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $276.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $25.17B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $7.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQTWO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QTWO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both NN and QTWO are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QTWO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QTWO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both NN and QTWO are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

NN (@Computer Communications) experienced а -7.18% price change this week, while QTWO (@Packaged Software) price change was -2.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -3.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.50%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -3.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

NN is expected to report earnings on Mar 25, 2026.

QTWO is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (-3.78% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

@Packaged Software (-3.36% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QTWO($4.36B) has a higher market cap than NN($1.53B). NN YTD gains are higher at: -26.928 vs. QTWO (-30.740). QTWO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 77.5M vs. NN (-119.19M). QTWO has more cash in the bank: 532M vs. NN (176M). NN has less debt than QTWO: NN (263M) vs QTWO (539M). QTWO has higher revenues than NN: QTWO (743M) vs NN (6.26M).
NNQTWONN / QTWO
Capitalization1.53B4.36B35%
EBITDA-119.19M77.5M-154%
Gain YTD-26.928-30.74088%
P/E RatioN/A139.42-
Revenue6.26M743M1%
Total Cash176M532M33%
Total Debt263M539M49%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QTWO: Fundamental Ratings
QTWO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
16
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
86
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NNQTWO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QTWO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LLPFX23.81N/A
N/A
Longleaf Partners
VEIRX97.65N/A
N/A
Vanguard Equity-Income Adm
GGIDX13.42N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Global Infras Instl
CIOIX19.76N/A
N/A
Causeway International Opps Inst
ABSYX23.16-0.33
-1.40%
American Beacon Small Cp Val Y

QTWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTWO has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QTWO jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QTWO
1D Price
Change %
QTWO100%
-0.36%
FRSH - QTWO
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.27%
ALKT - QTWO
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
COIN - QTWO
62%
Loosely correlated
-7.44%
PCOR - QTWO
61%
Loosely correlated
-3.14%
WEAV - QTWO
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.48%
More