NNFSF vs PEP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NNFSF is a Hold and PEP is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NNFSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePEP’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- NNFSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PEP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PEP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- PEP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
NNFSF (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PEP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +2.13% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.14%.
Reported Earning Dates
PEP is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-0.16% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
| NNFSF | PEP | NNFSF / PEP | |
| Capitalization | 65.3B | 241B | 27% |
| EBITDA | 11.8B | 15.8B | 75% |
| Gain YTD | -31.634 | -2.393 | 1,322% |
| P/E Ratio | 49.50 | 26.37 | 188% |
| Revenue | 29.7B | 91.5B | 32% |
| Total Cash | 15B | 10B | 150% |
| Total Debt | 2.59B | 44.7B | 6% |
PEP | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 4 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 28 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 29 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 20 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| PEP | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 36% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 44% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 37% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 43% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 38% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 37% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 40% |
NNFSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NNFSF and MOJO have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NNFSF and MOJO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NNFSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NNFSF | 100% | N/A | ||
| MOJO - NNFSF | 5% Poorly correlated | -3.00% | ||
| PEP - NNFSF | 4% Poorly correlated | +1.04% | ||
| CELH - NNFSF | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.90% | ||
| PRMW - NNFSF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KOF - NNFSF | 3% Poorly correlated | +1.46% | ||
More | ||||
PEP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PEP has been loosely correlated with KO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PEP jumps, then KO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PEP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEP | 100% | +1.04% | ||
| KO - PEP | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| KDP - PEP | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.30% | ||
| FIZZ - PEP | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.74% | ||
| CCEP - PEP | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| MNST - PEP | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.15% | ||
More | ||||