NNFSF
Price
$6.89
Change
+$0.87 (+14.45%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Capitalization
76.96B
PEP
Price
$138.74
Change
-$2.05 (-1.46%)
Updated
Oct 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
192.75B
One day until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NNFSF vs PEP

Header iconNNFSF vs PEP Comparison
Open Charts NNFSF vs PEPBanner chart's image
NONGFU SPRING
Price$6.89
Change+$0.87 (+14.45%)
Volume$100
Capitalization76.96B
Pepsi
Price$138.74
Change-$2.05 (-1.46%)
Volume$192.39K
Capitalization192.75B
NNFSF vs PEP Comparison Chart in %
NNFSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PEP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NNFSF vs. PEP commentary
Oct 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NNFSF is a Buy and PEP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 08, 2025
Stock price -- (NNFSF: $6.89 vs. PEP: $140.79)
Brand notoriety: NNFSF: Not notable vs. PEP: Notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NNFSF: 10% vs. PEP: 79%
Market capitalization -- NNFSF: $76.96B vs. PEP: $192.75B
NNFSF [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] is valued at $76.96B. PEP’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $192.75B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $287.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $20.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NNFSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePEP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NNFSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PEP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both NNFSF and PEP are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NNFSF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PEP’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NNFSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • PEP’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NNFSF is a better buy in the short-term than PEP.

Price Growth

NNFSF (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PEP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +0.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +0.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

PEP is expected to report earnings on Oct 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+0.94% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEP($193B) has a higher market cap than NNFSF($77B). NNFSF has higher P/E ratio than PEP: NNFSF (40.87) vs PEP (25.64). NNFSF YTD gains are higher at: 55.855 vs. PEP (-4.645).
NNFSFPEPNNFSF / PEP
Capitalization77B193B40%
EBITDAN/A14.4B-
Gain YTD55.855-4.645-1,202%
P/E Ratio40.8725.64159%
RevenueN/A91.7B-
Total CashN/A7.97B-
Total DebtN/A51.4B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PEP: Fundamental Ratings
PEP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
68
SMR RATING
1..100
24
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NNFSFPEP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
38%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NNFSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PEP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DSTX30.96N/A
N/A
Distillate Intntnl Fndmntl Stblty&Vl ETF
RSSE21.17-0.04
-0.17%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Eql Wght Buffr ETF - Sep
GHYG46.18-0.15
-0.31%
iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bd ETF
XLI154.25-0.88
-0.57%
The Industrial Select Sector SPDR® ETF
FYC91.61-0.91
-0.98%
First Trust Small Cap Gr AlphaDEX® ETF

NNFSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NNFSF and MOJO have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NNFSF and MOJO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NNFSF
1D Price
Change %
NNFSF100%
N/A
MOJO - NNFSF
5%
Poorly correlated
-7.98%
PEP - NNFSF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.78%
CELH - NNFSF
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.30%
KOF - NNFSF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
GOGY - NNFSF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PEP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PEP has been loosely correlated with KO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PEP jumps, then KO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PEP
1D Price
Change %
PEP100%
+0.78%
KO - PEP
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
KDP - PEP
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
MNST - PEP
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.58%
FIZZ - PEP
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.81%
CCEP - PEP
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
More