Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NNTWX vs RPMGX
NNTWX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts NNTWX vs RPMGX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$102.19
Change-$0.09 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27B
NNTWX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NNTWX vs. RPMGX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NNTWX is a Hold and RPMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 27B vs. NNTWX (1.04B). NNTWX pays higher dividends than RPMGX: NNTWX (0.10) vs RPMGX (0.00). NNTWX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: NNTWX (21 years) vs RPMGX (33 years). NNTWX (0.90) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.75). RPMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. NNTWX (9.52). NNTWX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: NNTWX (500) vs RPMGX (2500). NNTWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.69 vs. RPMGX (-5.53). NNTWX return over 5 years is better than : 16.27 vs. RPMGX (2.28).
| NNTWX | RPMGX | NNTWX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.75 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.75 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.313 | 2.557 | 12% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 2500 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 27B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.69 | -5.53 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.86 | 13.19 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.27 | 2.28 | 714% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.89 | 29.10 | 82% |