Advertisement
NOA vs TRRVF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NOA is a Buy and TRRVF is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NOA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTRRVF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- NOA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TRRVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NOA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRRVF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- NOA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TRRVF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
NOA (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +2.25% price change this week, while TRRVF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +0.22% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +4.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.08%.
Reported Earning Dates
NOA is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+4.01% weekly)The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.
| NOA | TRRVF | NOA / TRRVF | |
| Capitalization | 395M | 2.28B | 17% |
| EBITDA | 296M | 244M | 121% |
| Gain YTD | -37.020 | 35.216 | -105% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.82 | 37.46 | 42% |
| Revenue | 1.25B | 1.18B | 106% |
| Total Cash | 79M | 27.1M | 292% |
| Total Debt | 884M | 963M | 92% |
NOA | TRRVF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 83 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 41 Fair valued | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 15 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NOA's Valuation (41) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRRVF (81) in the null industry. This means that NOA’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRRVF’s over the last 12 months.
TRRVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOA (63) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that TRRVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOA’s over the last 12 months.
TRRVF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NOA (100) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that TRRVF’s stock grew similarly to NOA’s over the last 12 months.
TRRVF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as NOA (87) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that TRRVF’s stock grew similarly to NOA’s over the last 12 months.
TRRVF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NOA (100) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that TRRVF’s stock grew similarly to NOA’s over the last 12 months.
| NOA | TRRVF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 33% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 38% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 8 days ago 56% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 31% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 36% |
Advertisement
NOA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOA has been loosely correlated with EFXT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NOA jumps, then EFXT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NOA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOA | 100% | +1.26% | ||
| EFXT - NOA | 49% Loosely correlated | +3.07% | ||
| WFRD - NOA | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| VAL - NOA | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| OII - NOA | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| HLX - NOA | 45% Loosely correlated | +2.17% | ||
More | ||||
TRRVF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TRRVF and CESDF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRRVF and CESDF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TRRVF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRRVF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CESDF - TRRVF | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.57% | ||
| TOLWF - TRRVF | 22% Poorly correlated | +3.70% | ||
| NOA - TRRVF | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.26% | ||
| TS - TRRVF | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.11% | ||
| OII - TRRVF | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.82% | ||
More | ||||