NOA
Price
$16.20
Change
+$0.42 (+2.66%)
Updated
May 12, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
604.62M
2 days until earnings call
TRRVF
Price
$119.50
Change
-$0.44 (-0.37%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
800.19M
Ad is loading...

NOA vs TRRVF

Header iconNOA vs TRRVF Comparison
Open Charts NOA vs TRRVFBanner chart's image
North American Construction Group
Price$16.20
Change+$0.42 (+2.66%)
Volume$930
Capitalization604.62M
TerraVest Industries
Price$119.50
Change-$0.44 (-0.37%)
Volume$3.29K
Capitalization800.19M
NOA vs TRRVF Comparison Chart
Loading...
NOA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NOA vs. TRRVF commentary
May 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NOA is a StrongBuy and TRRVF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 12, 2025
Stock price -- (NOA: $15.78 vs. TRRVF: $119.50)
Brand notoriety: NOA and TRRVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NOA: 54% vs. TRRVF: 27%
Market capitalization -- NOA: $604.62M vs. TRRVF: $800.19M
NOA [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $604.62M. TRRVF’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $800.19M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NOA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTRRVF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NOA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TRRVF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TRRVF is a better buy in the long-term than NOA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NOA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • NOA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

NOA (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +0.19% price change this week, while TRRVF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +2.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +3.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.32%.

Reported Earning Dates

NOA is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+3.86% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRRVF($800M) has a higher market cap than NOA($605M). TRRVF has higher P/E ratio than NOA: TRRVF (23.42) vs NOA (14.57). TRRVF YTD gains are higher at: 53.421 vs. NOA (-26.978). NOA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 253M vs. TRRVF (137M). NOA has more cash in the bank: 88.6M vs. TRRVF (18.2M). TRRVF has less debt than NOA: TRRVF (391M) vs NOA (717M). NOA has higher revenues than TRRVF: NOA (957M) vs TRRVF (729M).
NOATRRVFNOA / TRRVF
Capitalization605M800M76%
EBITDA253M137M185%
Gain YTD-26.97853.421-51%
P/E Ratio14.5723.4262%
Revenue957M729M131%
Total Cash88.6M18.2M487%
Total Debt717M391M183%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NOA vs TRRVF: Fundamental Ratings
NOA
TRRVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2650
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
413
SMR RATING
1..100
5340
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6136
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6311
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NOA's Valuation (47) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRRVF (86) in the null industry. This means that NOA’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRRVF’s over the last 12 months.

TRRVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOA (41) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that TRRVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOA’s over the last 12 months.

TRRVF's SMR Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as NOA (53) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that TRRVF’s stock grew similarly to NOA’s over the last 12 months.

TRRVF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as NOA (61) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that TRRVF’s stock grew similarly to NOA’s over the last 12 months.

TRRVF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOA (63) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that TRRVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NOA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NOA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NRILX14.690.14
+0.96%
Neuberger Berman International Sel R6
LAFLX13.120.03
+0.23%
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value A
CGJIX63.50-0.04
-0.06%
Calvert US Large Cap Growth Rspnb Idx I
LMPPX34.16-0.03
-0.09%
ClearBridge Appreciation R
TSMGX15.19-0.04
-0.26%
Touchstone Sands Cptl Emerg Mkts Gr A

NOA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOA has been loosely correlated with VAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NOA jumps, then VAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NOA
1D Price
Change %
NOA100%
-1.00%
VAL - NOA
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.97%
TS - NOA
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.28%
WFRD - NOA
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.12%
HAL - NOA
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
OII - NOA
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
More

TRRVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TRRVF and CESDF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRRVF and CESDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRRVF
1D Price
Change %
TRRVF100%
-0.37%
CESDF - TRRVF
24%
Poorly correlated
-5.41%
TOLWF - TRRVF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
CHX - TRRVF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
NOA - TRRVF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.00%
TS - TRRVF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
More