NOA
Price
$15.35
Change
+$0.20 (+1.32%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
604.62M
4 days until earnings call
WFRD
Price
$46.68
Change
+$2.40 (+5.42%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
8.55B
3 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

NOA vs WFRD

Header iconNOA vs WFRD Comparison
Open Charts NOA vs WFRDBanner chart's image
North American Construction Group
Price$15.35
Change+$0.20 (+1.32%)
Volume$85.92K
Capitalization604.62M
Weatherford International
Price$46.68
Change+$2.40 (+5.42%)
Volume$1.33M
Capitalization8.55B
NOA vs WFRD Comparison Chart
Loading...
NOA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFRD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NOA vs. WFRD commentary
Apr 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NOA is a Hold and WFRD is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 19, 2025
Stock price -- (NOA: $15.35 vs. WFRD: $46.68)
Brand notoriety: NOA and WFRD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NOA: 87% vs. WFRD: 88%
Market capitalization -- NOA: $604.62M vs. WFRD: $8.55B
NOA [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $604.62M. WFRD’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $8.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NOA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWFRD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NOA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WFRD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NOA is a better buy in the long-term than WFRD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NOA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WFRD’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NOA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WFRD’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WFRD is a better buy in the short-term than NOA.

Price Growth

NOA (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +11.64% price change this week, while WFRD (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +16.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +3.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

NOA is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

WFRD is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+3.92% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WFRD($8.55B) has a higher market cap than NOA($605M). WFRD has higher P/E ratio than NOA: WFRD (20.90) vs NOA (14.57). NOA YTD gains are higher at: -28.968 vs. WFRD (-34.599). WFRD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.02B vs. NOA (253M). WFRD has more cash in the bank: 958M vs. NOA (88.6M). NOA has less debt than WFRD: NOA (717M) vs WFRD (2.06B). WFRD has higher revenues than NOA: WFRD (5.14B) vs NOA (957M).
NOAWFRDNOA / WFRD
Capitalization605M8.55B7%
EBITDA253M1.02B25%
Gain YTD-28.968-34.59984%
P/E Ratio14.5720.9070%
Revenue957M5.14B19%
Total Cash88.6M958M9%
Total Debt717M2.06B35%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NOA: Fundamental Ratings
NOA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
42
SMR RATING
1..100
54
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
79
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NOAWFRD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NOA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFRD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MXF15.010.37
+2.53%
Mexico Fund
IEUS58.280.80
+1.39%
iShares MSCI Europe Small-Cap ETF
FOVL65.030.70
+1.09%
iShares Focused Value Factor ETF
FJUN48.020.14
+0.28%
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Jun
FTEC150.25-0.85
-0.56%
Fidelity MSCI Information Tech ETF

NOA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOA has been loosely correlated with VAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NOA jumps, then VAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NOA
1D Price
Change %
NOA100%
+1.32%
VAL - NOA
58%
Loosely correlated
+5.95%
HAL - NOA
57%
Loosely correlated
+5.13%
FTI - NOA
56%
Loosely correlated
+2.20%
WFRD - NOA
56%
Loosely correlated
+5.41%
OII - NOA
55%
Loosely correlated
+3.65%
More

WFRD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WFRD has been closely correlated with CHX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WFRD jumps, then CHX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WFRD
1D Price
Change %
WFRD100%
+5.41%
CHX - WFRD
79%
Closely correlated
+2.92%
SLB - WFRD
79%
Closely correlated
+2.81%
HAL - WFRD
78%
Closely correlated
+5.13%
XPRO - WFRD
75%
Closely correlated
+3.96%
FTI - WFRD
74%
Closely correlated
+2.20%
More