It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NOKBF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZBRA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ZBRA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
NOKBF (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а -5.75% price change this week, while ZBRA (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was -0.60% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was +4.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.19%.
ZBRA is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.
The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.
NOKBF | ZBRA | NOKBF / ZBRA | |
Capitalization | 21.9B | 15.5B | 141% |
EBITDA | 3.51B | 643M | 546% |
Gain YTD | 22.169 | 43.530 | 51% |
P/E Ratio | 4.85 | 52.62 | 9% |
Revenue | 25.3B | 4.58B | 552% |
Total Cash | 7.48B | 137M | 5,459% |
Total Debt | 5.2B | 2.41B | 216% |
NOKBF | ZBRA | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 70 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 6 Undervalued | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 85 | 64 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | 62 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 19 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | 12 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 2 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NOKBF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ZBRA (79) in the Computer Peripherals industry. This means that NOKBF’s stock grew significantly faster than ZBRA’s over the last 12 months.
ZBRA's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the Computer Peripherals industry is in the same range as NOKBF (85) in the null industry. This means that ZBRA’s stock grew similarly to NOKBF’s over the last 12 months.
ZBRA's SMR Rating (62) in the Computer Peripherals industry is in the same range as NOKBF (87) in the null industry. This means that ZBRA’s stock grew similarly to NOKBF’s over the last 12 months.
ZBRA's Price Growth Rating (19) in the Computer Peripherals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOKBF (54) in the null industry. This means that ZBRA’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOKBF’s over the last 12 months.
ZBRA's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Computer Peripherals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOKBF (73) in the null industry. This means that ZBRA’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOKBF’s over the last 12 months.
ZBRA | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago60% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago63% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago66% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago63% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOKBF has been closely correlated with NOK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NOKBF jumps, then NOK could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NOKBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NOKBF | 100% | -3.81% | ||
NOK - NOKBF | 71% Closely correlated | -2.82% | ||
ERIC - NOKBF | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.25% | ||
ZBRA - NOKBF | 25% Poorly correlated | +2.02% | ||
UI - NOKBF | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.39% | ||
HPE - NOKBF | 22% Poorly correlated | +2.64% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZBRA has been loosely correlated with CLFD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZBRA jumps, then CLFD could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ZBRA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ZBRA | 100% | +2.02% | ||
CLFD - ZBRA | 46% Loosely correlated | +3.02% | ||
PI - ZBRA | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.27% | ||
LITE - ZBRA | 42% Loosely correlated | +3.81% | ||
DGII - ZBRA | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.22% | ||
UI - ZBRA | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.39% | ||
More |