Ad is loading...
NPACF
Price
$18.70
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 9 closing price
PUBM
Price
$14.88
Change
-$0.75 (-4.80%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
105 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

NPACF vs PUBM

Header iconNPACF vs PUBM Comparison
Open Charts NPACF vs PUBMBanner chart's image
Quadient SA
Price$18.70
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$400
CapitalizationN/A
PubMatic
Price$14.88
Change-$0.75 (-4.80%)
Volume$432.06K
CapitalizationN/A
NPACF vs PUBM Comparison Chart
Loading...
PUBM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NPACF vs. PUBM commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPACF is a Hold and PUBM is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (NPACF: $18.70 vs. PUBM: $14.88)
Brand notoriety: NPACF and PUBM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NPACF: 100% vs. PUBM: 121%
Market capitalization -- NPACF: $767.63M vs. PUBM: $1.19B
NPACF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $767.63M. PUBM’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $1.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NPACF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePUBM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NPACF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PUBM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NPACF is a better buy in the long-term than PUBM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PUBM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PUBM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

NPACF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PUBM (@Packaged Software) price change was -4.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

PUBM is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.01% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PUBM($1.19B) has a higher market cap than NPACF($768M). PUBM has higher P/E ratio than NPACF: PUBM (148.38) vs NPACF (9.60). PUBM YTD gains are higher at: -8.768 vs. NPACF (-10.952). NPACF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 228M vs. PUBM (46.8M). PUBM has more cash in the bank: 175M vs. NPACF (133M). PUBM has less debt than NPACF: PUBM (21.8M) vs NPACF (910M). NPACF has higher revenues than PUBM: NPACF (1.04B) vs PUBM (267M).
NPACFPUBMNPACF / PUBM
Capitalization768M1.19B65%
EBITDA228M46.8M487%
Gain YTD-10.952-8.768125%
P/E Ratio9.60148.386%
Revenue1.04B267M391%
Total Cash133M175M76%
Total Debt910M21.8M4,174%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NPACF: Fundamental Ratings
NPACF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
80
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
71
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PUBM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PUBM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BGVCX30.91-0.18
-0.58%
Brandes Global Equity C
MUXYX29.78-0.40
-1.33%
Victory S&P 500 Index Y
PLAAX17.19-0.35
-2.00%
PACE Large Co Growth Equity A
CGOAX25.78-0.56
-2.13%
Columbia Small Cap Growth A
MLRRX12.95-0.30
-2.26%
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth Class R1

NPACF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NPACF has been loosely correlated with LKRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NPACF jumps, then LKRY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NPACF
1D Price
Change %
NPACF100%
N/A
LKRY - NPACF
52%
Loosely correlated
N/A
VCSA - NPACF
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.24%
NRDY - NPACF
35%
Loosely correlated
+13.73%
PUBM - NPACF
31%
Poorly correlated
-4.80%
MITK - NPACF
31%
Poorly correlated
-3.79%
More

PUBM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PUBM has been loosely correlated with NRDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PUBM jumps, then NRDY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PUBM
1D Price
Change %
PUBM100%
-4.80%
NRDY - PUBM
64%
Loosely correlated
+13.73%
MITK - PUBM
59%
Loosely correlated
-3.79%
CLSK - PUBM
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
DOCS - PUBM
54%
Loosely correlated
-5.07%
RIOT - PUBM
53%
Loosely correlated
+4.26%
More