Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NPFCX vs PRGSX
NPFCX vs PRGSX Comparison
Open Charts NPFCX vs PRGSX
NPFCX vs PRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPFCX vs. PRGSX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPFCX is a Hold and PRGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. PRGSX (8.68B). NPFCX pays higher dividends than PRGSX: NPFCX (0.33) vs PRGSX (0.12). NPFCX was incepted earlier than PRGSX: NPFCX (25 years) vs PRGSX (31 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than PRGSX (0.81). PRGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 172.20 vs. NPFCX (23.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRGSX: NPFCX (250) vs PRGSX (2500). PRGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.76 vs. NPFCX (6.26). PRGSX return over 5 years is better than : 16.06 vs. NPFCX (8.52).
| NPFCX | PRGSX | NPFCX / PRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.81 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.81 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.931 | 20.299 | 24% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 8.68B | 1,958% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.12 | 271% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.26 | 22.76 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.32 | 54.58 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.52 | 16.06 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.35 | 205.96 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers