Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NPFCX vs PRGSX
NPFCX vs PRGSX Comparison
Open Charts NPFCX vs PRGSX
NPFCX vs PRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPFCX vs. PRGSX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPFCX is a StrongBuy and PRGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 166B vs. PRGSX (8.42B). NPFCX pays higher dividends than PRGSX: NPFCX (0.33) vs PRGSX (0.12). NPFCX was incepted earlier than PRGSX: NPFCX (25 years) vs PRGSX (31 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than PRGSX (0.81). PRGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 172.20 vs. NPFCX (23.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRGSX: NPFCX (250) vs PRGSX (2500). PRGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.24 vs. NPFCX (5.93). PRGSX return over 5 years is better than : 10.17 vs. NPFCX (5.89).
| NPFCX | PRGSX | NPFCX / PRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.81 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.81 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.961 | 18.976 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 166B | 8.42B | 1,972% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.12 | 263% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.93 | 19.24 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.05 | 53.10 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.89 | 10.17 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.30 | 190.96 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement