Ad is loading...
NPFCX vs RGCEX
NPFCX vs RGCEX Comparison
Open Charts NPFCX vs RGCEX
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$59.07
Change+$0.11 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets142.07B
Columbia Select Global Equity C
Price$15.34
Change+$0.08 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets699.98M
NPFCX vs RGCEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPFCX vs. RGCEX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPFCX is a Buy and RGCEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 142B vs. RGCEX (700M). NPFCX (0.00) and RGCEX (0.00) have matching dividends . NPFCX was incepted earlier than RGCEX: NPFCX (24 years) vs RGCEX (25 years). RGCEX (1.99) is less costly to investors than NPFCX (1.48). RGCEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. NPFCX (24.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGCEX: NPFCX (250) vs RGCEX (2000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.29 vs. RGCEX (-1.17). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 40.98 vs. RGCEX (19.97).
| NPFCX | RGCEX | NPFCX / RGCEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.97 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.99 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.021 | 1.328 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 142B | 700M | 20,286% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.29 | -1.17 | -368% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.89 | 25.60 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.98 | 19.97 | 205% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.49 | 67.51 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...