Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NPFCX vs RGCEX
NPFCX vs RGCEX Comparison
Open Charts NPFCX vs RGCEX
NPFCX vs RGCEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPFCX vs. RGCEX commentary
Jul 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPFCX is a Buy and RGCEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. RGCEX (820M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than RGCEX: NPFCX (0.33) vs RGCEX (0.00). NPFCX was incepted earlier than RGCEX: NPFCX (25 years) vs RGCEX (26 years). RGCEX (1.98) is less costly to investors than NPFCX (1.47). RGCEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGCEX: NPFCX (250) vs RGCEX (2000). RGCEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.01 vs. NPFCX (6.28). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 9.04 vs. RGCEX (4.34).
| NPFCX | RGCEX | NPFCX / RGCEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.95 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.98 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.404 | 14.558 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 820M | 20,976% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.28 | 9.01 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.24 | 33.98 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.04 | 4.34 | 208% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.85 | 93.35 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement