Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NPFCX vs RGERX
NPFCX vs RGERX Comparison
Open Charts NPFCX vs RGERX
NPFCX vs RGERX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPFCX vs. RGERX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPFCX is a Hold and RGERX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. RGERX (834M). RGERX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: RGERX (0.46) vs NPFCX (0.33). NPFCX was incepted earlier than RGERX: NPFCX (25 years) vs RGERX (19 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than RGERX (0.95). RGERX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). RGERX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPFCX: RGERX (0) vs NPFCX (250). RGERX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.09 vs. NPFCX (12.68). RGERX return over 5 years is better than : 24.62 vs. NPFCX (14.35).
| NPFCX | RGERX | NPFCX / RGERX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.92 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.95 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.915 | 15.236 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164B | 834M | 19,664% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.46 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.68 | 17.09 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.88 | 45.27 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.35 | 24.62 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.83 | 133.28 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement