Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NPFCX vs RGERX
NPFCX vs RGERX Comparison
Open Charts NPFCX vs RGERX
NPFCX vs RGERX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPFCX vs. RGERX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPFCX is a Hold and RGERX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. RGERX (831M). RGERX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: RGERX (0.45) vs NPFCX (0.33). NPFCX was incepted earlier than RGERX: NPFCX (25 years) vs RGERX (20 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than RGERX (0.95). RGERX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). RGERX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPFCX: RGERX (0) vs NPFCX (250). RGERX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.15 vs. NPFCX (6.26). RGERX return over 5 years is better than : 16.41 vs. NPFCX (8.52).
| NPFCX | RGERX | NPFCX / RGERX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.92 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.95 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.931 | 15.622 | 32% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 831M | 20,457% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.45 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.26 | 14.15 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.32 | 41.23 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.52 | 16.41 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.35 | 128.95 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers