Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NPFCX vs RNGAX
NPFCX vs RNGAX Comparison
Open Charts NPFCX vs RNGAX
NPFCX vs RNGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPFCX vs. RNGAX commentary
Aug 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPFCX is a Buy and RNGAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 166B vs. RNGAX (48.7B). NPFCX pays higher dividends than RNGAX: NPFCX (0.33) vs RNGAX (0.00). NPFCX was incepted earlier than RNGAX: NPFCX (25 years) vs RNGAX (24 years). RNGAX (1.49) and NPFCX (1.47) have similar cost to investors . RNGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). NPFCX (250) and RNGAX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RNGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.69 vs. NPFCX (6.92). RNGAX return over 5 years is better than : 21.39 vs. NPFCX (9.27).
| NPFCX | RNGAX | NPFCX / RNGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.49 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.49 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.953 | 18.229 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 166B | 48.7B | 341% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.92 | 20.69 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.26 | 58.19 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.27 | 21.39 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.12 | 105.95 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement