Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NPFCX vs RNGCX
NPFCX vs RNGCX Comparison
Open Charts NPFCX vs RNGCX
NPFCX vs RNGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPFCX vs. RNGCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPFCX is a Hold and RNGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. RNGCX (51.8B). NPFCX pays higher dividends than RNGCX: NPFCX (0.33) vs RNGCX (0.00). NPFCX was incepted earlier than RNGCX: NPFCX (25 years) vs RNGCX (24 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than RNGCX (1.05). RNGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). NPFCX (250) and RNGCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RNGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.03 vs. NPFCX (6.26). RNGCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.69 vs. NPFCX (8.52).
| NPFCX | RNGCX | NPFCX / RNGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.05 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.05 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.931 | 16.846 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 51.8B | 328% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.26 | 24.03 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.32 | 59.45 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.52 | 28.69 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.35 | 129.88 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers