Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NPFCX vs RNGEX
NPFCX vs RNGEX Comparison
Open Charts NPFCX vs RNGEX
NPFCX vs RNGEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPFCX vs. RNGEX commentary
Aug 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPFCX is a Buy and RNGEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 166B vs. RNGEX (48.7B). NPFCX pays higher dividends than RNGEX: NPFCX (0.33) vs RNGEX (0.00). NPFCX was incepted earlier than RNGEX: NPFCX (25 years) vs RNGEX (24 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than RNGEX (0.75). RNGEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). NPFCX (250) and RNGEX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RNGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.73 vs. NPFCX (7.38). RNGEX return over 5 years is better than : 32.76 vs. NPFCX (9.89).
| NPFCX | RNGEX | NPFCX / RNGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.75 | 196% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.75 | 196% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.564 | 19.830 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 166B | 48.7B | 341% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.38 | 24.73 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.38 | 69.82 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.89 | 32.76 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.13 | 135.77 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers