Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NPFCX vs RNGFX
NPFCX vs RNGFX Comparison
Open Charts NPFCX vs RNGFX
NPFCX vs RNGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPFCX vs. RNGFX commentary
Jun 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPFCX is a Hold and RNGFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. RNGFX (51.4B). NPFCX pays higher dividends than RNGFX: NPFCX (0.33) vs RNGFX (0.00). NPFCX was incepted earlier than RNGFX: NPFCX (25 years) vs RNGFX (24 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than RNGFX (0.45). RNGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). NPFCX (250) and RNGFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RNGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.31 vs. NPFCX (11.61). RNGFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.05 vs. NPFCX (12.94).
| NPFCX | RNGFX | NPFCX / RNGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.45 | 327% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.45 | 327% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.243 | 23.738 | 26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 51.4B | 335% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.61 | 39.31 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.24 | 78.40 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.94 | 45.05 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.50 | 164.05 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers