Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NPFCX vs RNGFX
NPFCX vs RNGFX Comparison
Open Charts NPFCX vs RNGFX
NPFCX vs RNGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPFCX vs. RNGFX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPFCX is a Hold and RNGFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. RNGFX (50B). NPFCX pays higher dividends than RNGFX: NPFCX (0.33) vs RNGFX (0.00). NPFCX was incepted earlier than RNGFX: NPFCX (26 years) vs RNGFX (24 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than RNGFX (0.45). RNGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). NPFCX (250) and RNGFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RNGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.45 vs. NPFCX (1.56). RNGFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.68 vs. NPFCX (5.20).
| NPFCX | RNGFX | NPFCX / RNGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.45 | 327% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.45 | 327% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.266 | 16.473 | 32% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 169B | 50B | 338% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.56 | 14.45 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.04 | 66.64 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.20 | 28.68 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.65 | 135.21 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement