Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NPFCX vs RNNEX
NPFCX vs RNNEX Comparison
Open Charts NPFCX vs RNNEX
NPFCX vs RNNEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPFCX vs. RNNEX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPFCX is a Hold and RNNEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. RNNEX (46.5B). NPFCX pays higher dividends than RNNEX: NPFCX (0.33) vs RNNEX (0.00). NPFCX was incepted earlier than RNNEX: NPFCX (25 years) vs RNNEX (12 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than RNNEX (1.20). RNNEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). NPFCX (250) and RNNEX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RNNEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.76 vs. NPFCX (12.68). RNNEX return over 5 years is better than : 39.73 vs. NPFCX (14.35).
| NPFCX | RNNEX | NPFCX / RNNEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.20 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.20 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.915 | 22.622 | 31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164B | 46.5B | 353% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.68 | 39.76 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.88 | 74.27 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.35 | 39.73 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.83 | 138.86 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement