Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NPFCX vs RNPAX
NPFCX vs RNPAX Comparison
Open Charts NPFCX vs RNPAX
NPFCX vs RNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPFCX vs. RNPAX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPFCX is a Hold and RNPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX (170B) and RNPAX (170B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RNPAX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: RNPAX (0.37) vs NPFCX (0.33). NPFCX was incepted earlier than RNPAX: NPFCX (25 years) vs RNPAX (24 years). RNPAX (1.49) and NPFCX (1.47) have similar cost to investors . NPFCX (23.00) and RNPAX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. NPFCX (250) and RNPAX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.57 vs. RNPAX (2.43). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 5.91 vs. RNPAX (5.41).
| NPFCX | RNPAX | NPFCX / RNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.49 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.49 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.343 | 3.322 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 170B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.37 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.57 | 2.43 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.03 | 28.65 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.91 | 5.41 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.05 | 91.91 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers