Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NPFCX vs SCMGX
NPFCX vs SCMGX Comparison
Open Charts NPFCX vs SCMGX
NPFCX vs SCMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPFCX vs. SCMGX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPFCX is a Hold and SCMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. SCMGX (739M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than SCMGX: NPFCX (0.33) vs SCMGX (0.07). NPFCX was incepted earlier than SCMGX: NPFCX (25 years) vs SCMGX (16 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than SCMGX (0.97). SCMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCMGX: NPFCX (250) vs SCMGX (1000000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.26 vs. SCMGX (-29.14). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 8.52 vs. SCMGX (-45.11).
| NPFCX | SCMGX | NPFCX / SCMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.97 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.97 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.931 | 2.459 | 201% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 739M | 23,004% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.07 | 494% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.26 | -29.14 | -21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.32 | -11.82 | -257% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.52 | -45.11 | -19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.35 | 33.01 | 292% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement