Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NPFCX vs SGAAX
NPFCX vs SGAAX Comparison
Open Charts NPFCX vs SGAAX
NPFCX vs SGAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPFCX vs. SGAAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPFCX is a Hold and SGAAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. SGAAX (160M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than SGAAX: NPFCX (0.33) vs SGAAX (0.00). NPFCX was incepted earlier than SGAAX: NPFCX (25 years) vs SGAAX (13 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than SGAAX (1.36). SGAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SGAAX: NPFCX (250) vs SGAAX (2500). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.68 vs. SGAAX (-13.56). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 14.35 vs. SGAAX (-33.05).
| NPFCX | SGAAX | NPFCX / SGAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.25 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.36 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.915 | -2.438 | -284% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164B | 160M | 102,500% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.68 | -13.56 | -93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.88 | -14.30 | -279% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.35 | -33.05 | -43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.83 | 33.17 | 310% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement