Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NPFCX vs SGACX
NPFCX vs SGACX Comparison
Open Charts NPFCX vs SGACX
NPFCX vs SGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPFCX vs. SGACX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPFCX is a Hold and SGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. SGACX (146M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than SGACX: NPFCX (0.33) vs SGACX (0.00). NPFCX was incepted earlier than SGACX: NPFCX (25 years) vs SGACX (13 years). SGACX (2.12) is less costly to investors than NPFCX (1.47). SGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SGACX: NPFCX (250) vs SGACX (2500). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.12 vs. SGACX (-19.45). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 11.16 vs. SGACX (-42.96).
| NPFCX | SGACX | NPFCX / SGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 2.00 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 2.12 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.075 | -6.887 | -88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 146M | 117,808% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.12 | -19.45 | -62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.44 | -24.36 | -154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.16 | -42.96 | -26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.02 | 15.13 | 734% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement