Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NPFCX vs SGAPX
NPFCX vs SGAPX Comparison
Open Charts NPFCX vs SGAPX
NPFCX vs SGAPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPFCX vs. SGAPX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPFCX is a Hold and SGAPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. SGAPX (148M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than SGAPX: NPFCX (0.33) vs SGAPX (0.00). NPFCX was incepted earlier than SGAPX: NPFCX (25 years) vs SGAPX (13 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than SGAPX (1.13). SGAPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SGAPX: NPFCX (250) vs SGAPX (100000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.12 vs. SGAPX (-16.70). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 11.16 vs. SGAPX (-36.02).
| NPFCX | SGAPX | NPFCX / SGAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.00 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.13 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.075 | -6.458 | -94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 148M | 116,216% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.12 | -16.70 | -73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.44 | -17.54 | -213% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.16 | -36.02 | -31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.02 | 35.58 | 312% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement