Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NPFCX vs TGBLX
NPFCX vs TGBLX Comparison
Open Charts NPFCX vs TGBLX
NPFCX vs TGBLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. TGBLX (32M). TGBLX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: TGBLX (0.54) vs NPFCX (0.33). NPFCX was incepted earlier than TGBLX: NPFCX (25 years) vs TGBLX (5 years). TGBLX (2.07) is less costly to investors than NPFCX (1.47). TGBLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.20 vs. NPFCX (23.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TGBLX: NPFCX (250) vs TGBLX (500000). TGBLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.49 vs. NPFCX (6.26). TGBLX return over 5 years is better than : 18.54 vs. NPFCX (8.52).
| NPFCX | TGBLX | NPFCX / TGBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.78 | 188% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 2.07 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.931 | 10.480 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 32M | 531,250% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.54 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.26 | 15.49 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.32 | 30.10 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.52 | 18.54 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.35 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement