Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NPFCX vs TRGLX
NPFCX vs TRGLX Comparison
Open Charts NPFCX vs TRGLX
NPFCX vs TRGLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPFCX vs. TRGLX commentary
Jul 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPFCX is a Buy and TRGLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. TRGLX (8.68B). NPFCX pays higher dividends than TRGLX: NPFCX (0.33) vs TRGLX (0.25). NPFCX was incepted earlier than TRGLX: NPFCX (25 years) vs TRGLX (9 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than TRGLX (0.66). TRGLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 172.20 vs. NPFCX (23.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRGLX: NPFCX (250) vs TRGLX (500000). TRGLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.16 vs. NPFCX (7.04). TRGLX return over 5 years is better than : 16.18 vs. NPFCX (10.00).
| NPFCX | TRGLX | NPFCX / TRGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.66 | 223% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.66 | 223% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.335 | 20.281 | 31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 8.68B | 1,959% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.25 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.04 | 22.16 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.38 | 58.82 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.00 | 16.18 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.72 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers