Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NPFCX vs TRGLX
NPFCX vs TRGLX Comparison
Open Charts NPFCX vs TRGLX
NPFCX vs TRGLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPFCX vs. TRGLX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPFCX is a StrongBuy and TRGLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. TRGLX (8.33B). NPFCX pays higher dividends than TRGLX: NPFCX (0.33) vs TRGLX (0.26). NPFCX was incepted earlier than TRGLX: NPFCX (26 years) vs TRGLX (10 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than TRGLX (0.66). TRGLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 172.20 vs. NPFCX (23.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRGLX: NPFCX (250) vs TRGLX (500000). TRGLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.62 vs. NPFCX (2.83). TRGLX return over 5 years is better than : 11.20 vs. NPFCX (6.04).
| NPFCX | TRGLX | NPFCX / TRGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.66 | 223% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.66 | 223% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.030 | 17.960 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 169B | 8.33B | 2,028% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.26 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.83 | 14.62 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.62 | 54.51 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.04 | 11.20 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.13 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers