Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NPFCX vs WAGSX
NPFCX vs WAGSX Comparison
Open Charts NPFCX vs WAGSX
NPFCX vs WAGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPFCX vs. WAGSX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPFCX is a Hold and WAGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. WAGSX (12.6M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than WAGSX: NPFCX (0.33) vs WAGSX (0.00). NPFCX was incepted earlier than WAGSX: NPFCX (25 years) vs WAGSX (7 years). WAGSX (2.81) is less costly to investors than NPFCX (1.47). WAGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAGSX: NPFCX (250) vs WAGSX (2000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.77 vs. WAGSX (-2.77). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 13.27 vs. WAGSX (-16.52).
| NPFCX | WAGSX | NPFCX / WAGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.36 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 2.81 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.037 | 2.850 | 247% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164B | 12.6M | 1,301,587% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.77 | -2.77 | -461% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.04 | 20.52 | 195% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.27 | -16.52 | -80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.06 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement