Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NPFCX vs WGFIX
NPFCX vs WGFIX Comparison
Open Charts NPFCX vs WGFIX
NPFCX vs WGFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPFCX vs. WGFIX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPFCX is a Hold and WGFIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. WGFIX (14.6M). WGFIX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: WGFIX (1.07) vs NPFCX (0.33). NPFCX was incepted earlier than WGFIX: NPFCX (25 years) vs WGFIX (19 years). WGFIX (1.72) is less costly to investors than NPFCX (1.47). WGFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WGFIX: NPFCX (250) vs WGFIX (500000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.12 vs. WGFIX (-34.70). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 11.16 vs. WGFIX (-61.80).
| NPFCX | WGFIX | NPFCX / WGFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.90 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.72 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.075 | 9.517 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 14.6M | 1,178,082% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 1.07 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.12 | -34.70 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.44 | -52.59 | -71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.16 | -61.80 | -18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.02 | -32.87 | -338% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement