Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NPFCX vs WGGNX
NPFCX vs WGGNX Comparison
Open Charts NPFCX vs WGGNX
NPFCX vs WGGNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPFCX vs. WGGNX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPFCX is a Hold and WGGNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. WGGNX (14.6M). WGGNX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: WGGNX (0.92) vs NPFCX (0.33). NPFCX was incepted earlier than WGGNX: NPFCX (25 years) vs WGGNX (19 years). WGGNX (1.98) is less costly to investors than NPFCX (1.47). WGGNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WGGNX: NPFCX (250) vs WGGNX (2500). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.12 vs. WGGNX (-35.92). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 11.16 vs. WGGNX (-63.15).
| NPFCX | WGGNX | NPFCX / WGGNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.15 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.98 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.075 | 9.375 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 14.6M | 1,178,082% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.92 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.12 | -35.92 | -34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.44 | -54.01 | -69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.16 | -63.15 | -18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.02 | -36.10 | -307% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement