Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NPFCX vs WGGSX
NPFCX vs WGGSX Comparison
Open Charts NPFCX vs WGGSX
NPFCX vs WGGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPFCX vs. WGGSX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPFCX is a Buy and WGGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 166B vs. WGGSX (12.8M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than WGGSX: NPFCX (0.33) vs WGGSX (0.00). NPFCX was incepted earlier than WGGSX: NPFCX (25 years) vs WGGSX (7 years). WGGSX (1.71) is less costly to investors than NPFCX (1.47). WGGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WGGSX: NPFCX (250) vs WGGSX (100000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.61 vs. WGGSX (1.75). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 10.29 vs. WGGSX (-17.62).
| NPFCX | WGGSX | NPFCX / WGGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.96 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.71 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.960 | 6.195 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 166B | 12.8M | 1,296,875% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.61 | 1.75 | 435% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.32 | 23.68 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.29 | -17.62 | -58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.09 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers