Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NPFCX vs ZGFAX
NPFCX vs ZGFAX Comparison
Open Charts NPFCX vs ZGFAX
NPFCX vs ZGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPFCX vs. ZGFAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPFCX is a Hold and ZGFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. ZGFAX (356M). ZGFAX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: ZGFAX (0.73) vs NPFCX (0.33). NPFCX was incepted earlier than ZGFAX: NPFCX (25 years) vs ZGFAX (8 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than ZGFAX (0.86). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. ZGFAX (14.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZGFAX: NPFCX (250) vs ZGFAX (100000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.12 vs. ZGFAX (-3.76). ZGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.21 vs. NPFCX (11.16).
| NPFCX | ZGFAX | NPFCX / ZGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.86 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.86 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.075 | -4.735 | -128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 356M | 48,315% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.73 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.12 | -3.76 | -323% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.44 | 23.37 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.16 | 18.21 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.02 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement