Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NPFCX vs ZGFIX
NPFCX vs ZGFIX Comparison
Open Charts NPFCX vs ZGFIX
NPFCX vs ZGFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPFCX vs. ZGFIX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPFCX is a Hold and ZGFIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. ZGFIX (335M). ZGFIX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: ZGFIX (0.73) vs NPFCX (0.33). NPFCX was incepted earlier than ZGFIX: NPFCX (25 years) vs ZGFIX (9 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than ZGFIX (1.00). NPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. ZGFIX (14.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZGFIX: NPFCX (250) vs ZGFIX (250000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.16 vs. ZGFIX (-4.56). ZGFIX return over 5 years is better than : 18.29 vs. NPFCX (5.21).
| NPFCX | ZGFIX | NPFCX / ZGFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.86 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.00 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.656 | -2.382 | -111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 335M | 50,746% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.73 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.16 | -4.56 | -47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.59 | 21.13 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.21 | 18.29 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.85 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement