Ad is loading...
NPFFX vs RNNEX
NPFFX vs RNNEX Comparison
Open Charts NPFFX vs RNNEX
American Funds New Perspective F1
Price$58.67
Change-$2.43 (-3.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.04B
American Funds New Economy R2E
Price$52.64
Change-$2.87 (-5.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.97B
NPFFX vs RNNEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPFFX vs. RNNEX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPFFX is a Hold and RNNEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFFX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. RNNEX (34B). NPFFX pays higher dividends than RNNEX: NPFFX (0.53) vs RNNEX (0.00). NPFFX was incepted earlier than RNNEX: NPFFX (24 years) vs RNNEX (11 years). RNNEX (1.21) is less costly to investors than NPFFX (0.78). RNNEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. NPFFX (24.00). NPFFX (250) and RNNEX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NPFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.29 vs. RNNEX (-3.24). NPFFX return over 5 years is better than : 68.70 vs. RNNEX (56.37).
| NPFFX | RNNEX | NPFFX / RNNEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.21 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.21 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.812 | -4.589 | 18% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 139B | 34B | 409% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.29 | -3.24 | -71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.41 | 5.96 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.70 | 56.37 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.52 | 45.31 | 138% |