Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NPFFX vs RNNEX
NPFFX vs RNNEX Comparison
Open Charts NPFFX vs RNNEX
NPFFX vs RNNEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPFFX vs. RNNEX commentary
Aug 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPFFX is a Hold and RNNEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFFX has more cash in the bank: 166B vs. RNNEX (48.7B). NPFFX pays higher dividends than RNNEX: NPFFX (0.94) vs RNNEX (0.00). NPFFX was incepted earlier than RNNEX: NPFFX (25 years) vs RNNEX (12 years). RNNEX (1.20) is less costly to investors than NPFFX (0.77). RNNEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. NPFFX (23.00). NPFFX (250) and RNNEX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RNNEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.71 vs. NPFFX (7.23). RNNEX return over 5 years is better than : 27.82 vs. NPFFX (14.68).
| NPFFX | RNNEX | NPFFX / RNNEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.20 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.20 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.272 | 17.580 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 166B | 48.7B | 341% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.23 | 22.71 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.64 | 66.45 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.68 | 27.82 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.80 | 120.26 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers