Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NPFFX vs RNNEX
NPFFX vs RNNEX Comparison
Open Charts NPFFX vs RNNEX
NPFFX vs RNNEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPFFX vs. RNNEX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPFFX is a Hold and RNNEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFFX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. RNNEX (46.5B). NPFFX pays higher dividends than RNNEX: NPFFX (0.92) vs RNNEX (0.00). NPFFX was incepted earlier than RNNEX: NPFFX (25 years) vs RNNEX (12 years). RNNEX (1.20) is less costly to investors than NPFFX (0.77). RNNEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. NPFFX (23.00). NPFFX (250) and RNNEX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RNNEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.76 vs. NPFFX (13.87). RNNEX return over 5 years is better than : 39.73 vs. NPFFX (19.26).
| NPFFX | RNNEX | NPFFX / RNNEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.20 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.20 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.230 | 22.622 | 32% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164B | 46.5B | 353% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.87 | 39.76 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.15 | 74.27 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.26 | 39.73 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.15 | 138.86 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement